The course I'm scheduled to teach in Web content development has had to be postponed to January. It's designed to serve both the students in our new Professional Communications certificate program and anyone else interested in the subject.
Alas, we just didn't get enough people. We have half a dozen certificate students, but that's all. So they'll be taking other courses in the program while we spend the fall semester marketing both the program in general and the Web content course in particular.
Those of us in the field have been baffled by the phenomenon: enormous interest in the techie end of Web creation, and enormous apathy toward the content for which the Website is merely a platform. I decided to write "Writing for the Web" after seeing a university bookstore with (I estimated) 170 shelf-feet of books on HTML, Perl, Web graphics, etc., and not a single title dealing with Web site text.
During the dot-com boom, Web writers were hired all over the place, but they were the first to go when boom went bust. A lot of them left the field entirely, going back to print media or into specializations like tech writing.
I keep telling myself that it's like early American TV, when people actually watched test patterns, ancient Felix the Cat cartoons, and live shows of truly agonizing amateurishness. A few years later, I keep telling myself, TV was broadcasting brilliant dramas, written for the medium. (I try not to tell myself that the golden age ended in Newton Minow's "vast wasteland," which has now endured for over 40 years.)
So, my argument by analogy goes, people will eventually recognize that good Web text is critical to a site's success. And so they will. Eventually. Until then, we have to keep the faith, learn from good and bad sites alike, and set a good example ourselves.
Recent Comments