Fish or Fishes?
Marsha asks:
Please tell me the plural of fish. In the dictionary it says plural is fish or fishes. When I look in the encyclopedia they use the term fishes a lot.
"Fish" is one of those odd words that's usually both singular and plural—like "deer" and (in Canada) "beer." So we can say:
We caught five fish.
We saw three deer.
We Canadians drank six beer. (See my additional comments in the continuation of this post.)
But we can use "fishes" when we are talking about different species:
The fishes of the Fraser River include salmon and sturgeon.
Speaking about "two beer" and "two beers"—most languages have odd little local differences that can turn into dialects and eventually into distinct languages. Canadian usage permits "beer" as a plural; American usage, as far as I know, does not.
Linguists call the line between two such usages an "isogloss" (literally, "same language"). Just as an isobar on a weather map describes a region of equal air pressure, an isogloss describes a region where most people follow a particular usage or pronunciation. In the "beer" example, the isogloss runs right along the US-Canadian boundary.
Similarly, isoglosses separate British "lorry" and North American "truck," and Californian "fender bender" and Tennessee "car smash" (a usage that scared me when I had to drive on the icy streets of Memphis long ago, and the papers warned of smashes galore).
I suspect isoglosses also exist between social classes and generations. My generation uses "said" for "said." My students use "like":
"So Crawford is like, 'We have a quiz on Monday,' and I'm like, 'Omigod, I can't be there!"


Is it proper to say "I feel nausiated" or "I feel nautious?"
Posted by: Shiela | June 30, 2005 at 03:28 PM
I feel fish, literally.
Posted by: anonny | December 02, 2005 at 01:47 PM
Ichthyologists tend to use "fish" to describe multiple individuals of the same species and "fishes" to describe individuals of different species. Check out this article: "http://mrcarlton.net/blog/?p=20"
Posted by: Stuart | July 08, 2006 at 07:21 AM
Fish?
Posted by: ratna | March 14, 2007 at 08:02 AM
i think it is fish and fishes, both are gramatically correct so tell my friend laura tullett that she is wrong because she it is fish but it could be fishes too so hahaha
Posted by: marci x | June 14, 2007 at 05:04 AM
im bored, history is so boring, mr elders, my history teacher bores me to tears, btw, i love fishes, lol. i love guppys!!!!!
Posted by: marci x | June 14, 2007 at 05:07 AM
As a professional ichthyologist I concur that in general English ( as opposed to US or Canadian) usage fish is the singular or plural apertaining to a single type or species.
Fishes is the plural where two or more different species / types are referred to
Posted by: Calypsofish | August 22, 2007 at 09:30 AM
As a professional knower of all things, I think I've got this one covered:
More than one fish in a pan = fish
More than one fish in the ocean = fishes
Posted by: one_bright_cookie | December 28, 2008 at 06:32 PM