I've just scanned a lot of Saudi media, both Arabic and English, and found nothing new about their MERS cases. They must still have a lot of cases in their hospitals, but no one is reporting on those patients' condition. No one is doing any follow-up stories on the families of those who have died. Perhaps most importantly, no one is pestering Saudi experts about the possible origins of this new disease.
These all seem to me, as a sometime journalist, to be obvious angles for new stories about a scary new bug. Evidently not to the Saudi media. (In fairness, the French media haven't said anything in over a week about the poor man still fighting MERS in Lille.)
I learned in China, 30 years ago, that even the Chinese media are free to report on news of fresh disasters—in other countries. But the Saudis aren't talking about cases in other countries, and neither are the other Gulf states. Jordan, where MERS emerged last year, hasn't published anything new about it for a week. (In fairness, the Jordan Times does report 71 measles cases so far this year, including 39 among Syrian refugees and 6 Iraqi refugees.)
If the governments of such countries really worried about a new disease outbreak, you would think they'd publicize the problem to their own people incessantly. Instead, the only thing they really fear is embarrassment: A virus has broken out on their watch, and they really would prefer to shut up and hope it goes away.
The decision-makers in such governments are highly intelligent, very well-educated men (and maybe, behind the scenes, a few women). They should be perfectly aware of the political hazards of allowing a new virus to fester and spread. And yet they prefer to keep quiet and to keep their media quiet. Do they really want to delegitimize themselves, and invite demonstrations in the streets while armoured limousines carry them to military airfields and exile?
I have no idea, but at the moment the silence of the Saudis does not bode well for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Recent Comments