Via HuffPost Entertainment, Larry Ceplair writes: Anti-Communist Mythomaniacs and Dalton Trumbo. Excerpt:
No other blacklisted Hollywood person stirs the nest of right-wing wasps as much as Dalton Trumbo. So, it is not surprising that they have swarmed against Trumbo, a movie honestly portraying him and his fight against the motion-picture blacklist.
Months before the movie opened, queen wasp Ann Coulter attacked the lead actor in the movie ("Bryan Cranston: From Meth Cook to Hitler Apologist)," while at the same time promoting fellow anti-Communist Allan H. Ryskind's book-length diatribe on the same subject (Hollywood Traitors: Blacklisted Screenwriters - Agents of Stalin, Allies of Hitler).
The movie opened during the first week of November, followed by more of the same from Ryskind (New York Post), Paul Kengor (Investors.com), and Sonny Bunch (The Daily Beast). One could say of them what Jesus said of Satan in Milton's Paradise Regained:
That hath been thy craft,
By mixing somewhat true to vent more lies.
But what have been thy answers, what but dark,
Ambiguous and with double sense deluding (I, 432-35).
Trumbo, perhaps because of his outsized personality, his flair for publicity, his success in undermining the blacklist, and the favorable treatment he has received from left-wing historians (including me), is a regular target of anti-Communist mythomaniacs. They attack him on four grounds: He was opposed to the United States going to war against Germany, from 1939-1941; he wrote, to suit his Communist overlords, an antiwar novel that was published just before the Soviet-German nonaggression treaty was signed; he was an "agent" of Josef Stalin; and he waffled during his testimony before the House Committee on Un-American Activities in 1947.
All of these attacks are rife with polemics and barren of facts. For example, Coulter inaccurately labeled Trumbo's 1939 novel, Johnny Got His Gun, "a pure propaganda piece designed to squelch American ardor for helping Hitler's victims." She also criticized Trumbo's subsequent novel, The Remarkable Andrew, as an example of his "aggressive effort to prevent America from joining the fight against Hitler."
In fact, most Americans were ardently opposed to a war with Germany, and the leaders of the United States, England and France, were desperately trying to stay out of such a war. The novels were not pro-German. They were, rather, antiwar. They admonished readers not to be swayed by jingoist or nationalist slogans, to think for themselves about supporting any war. In fact, it was the world's Communists who were, through their various fronts, urging the democratic countries to challenge Germany aggressively.
So, it is absurd to claim that Trumbo, who was not a Party member and was a long-standing antiwar advocate, wrote Johnny to support the Party line.
Recent Comments