There was a lot of confusion last week about swine flu. A presidential advisory group issued a “plausible scenario” in which a swine flu epidemic could cause up to 90,000 deaths, three times the mortality in a typical flu season.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention countered that the toll would most likely not approach that number.
Our own take is this: A swine flu epidemic this fall and winter is likely to infect more people than a normal flu, but the virus will not be abnormally lethal. If it spreads rapidly after schools open, we will have to face it without vaccine, which will not arrive in substantial quantities until the swine flu epidemic has peaked.
The report that sparked concern was issued by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. The council stressed that it was not predicting what would happen but was simply offering a scenario to help the government develop responses to a potential epidemic.
The report posited an epidemic that could produce symptoms in 60 million to 120 million people and cause as many as 90 million to seek medical attention; up to 1.8 million could be hospitalized, 300,000 could flood into crowded I.C.U.’s, and 30,000 to 90,000 people could die.
Even some members of the advisory panel think their estimates may be a bit high. In any case, this is a virus that is no more lethal, and possibly less lethal, than normal flu strains.This is why politicians and politically involved professionals like to keep their mouths shut: Mention something "plausible," and the media scream "inevitable!"
I think the NYT is maintaining the ethical position, as Mark Twain described it, of a Christian holding four aces.
We can shrug off H1N1 deaths if we don't care about pregnant women, fat people, children, diabetics, asthmatics, or others with underlying health conditions. As long as we're holding four aces, those deaths don't matter.
Recent Comments