Huizhou poultry market, August 2013. Credit: Nanfang Ribao.
One of the strange aspects of running a blog like this one is the occasional, unpredictable jolt of a new outbreak. I got a jolt in the spring of 2009 when the first reports came in about H1N1. When you're primed for H5N1 to come flying in from Asia, the way SARS did in 2003, it's an unpleasant but instructive experience to be blindsided by a virus no one's been thinking about—and right in your own back yard.
That happened again five months ago, on
March 31, when a virus that had never troubled anyone was announced to have killed two of its first three victims. That set off a frenzied ransacking of the web in search of more news; I even learned to love Google Translate because so much of the H7N9 news was in the Chinese media only.
At the end of spring H7N9 news seemed to taper off; it looked like another seasonal influenza that would likely come back in the fall. And of course the case of
Moumou Chen, the Huizhou chicken dealer, showed that H7N9 is no respecter of seasons.
I realize that flu viruses aren't very bright, but as a novelist I give them full marks as masters of plot. No sooner do we think we understand the situation than we feel the proverbial carpet yanked out from under us. If nothing else, it keeps our attention.
Curious to see what the researchers were doing during this mostly quiet summer, I searched for
H7N9 on Google Scholar, set for 2013 alone. I gather there have been over 700 scholarly articles on the subject, about two-thirds of them in Chinese.
So while Xinhua is
pretty quiet about H7N9, scientific journals are publishing a lot—on everything from developing effective vaccines to naming specific hospitals for H7N9 to the requirement for free medical treatment of H7N9 cases. (The last thing the authorities want is for patients to be more scared of medical bills than of the disease itself, or for cheese-paring bureaucrats to fuss over paperwork that might slow down treatment.)
Clearly, China's medical experts have responded to the challenge of a disease no one had ever heard of six months ago. While a few Weibo users have been "detained" for spreading false rumours of outbreaks, the scholarly literature seems to be wide open and on the web. I'm even a little surprised that the Chinese media haven't been scavenging that literature; one nursing journal's report on dealing with airway bleeding in H7N9 patients sounds very adequately lurid for mass audiences.
So as surprising as H7N9's very existence may be, it's encouraging to see both Chinese and world health agencies taking it so seriously. They're giving themselves a crash course in a new virus, and even if it remains a minor threat we'll know better how to handle the next threat.
By contrast, a Google Advanced Scholar search for
MERS-CoV turned up 174 articles. That response seems a little tepid, given that MERS has turned up internationally from the Persian Gulf to Britain.
Strikingly, most of the new literature has been in English, and I get the impression that more researchers with Chinese names are studying MERS than are researchers with Arabic names. Even the occasional article in
Oman Medical Journal appears in English, and
#Coruna, the Arabic hashtag for MERS, has little or nothing from researchers. It's as if the Arabic medical experts are too few to have their own discussions, or that English is the de facto language of their research.
So we have contrasting styles of dealing with outbreaks of new diseases. After their embarrassment over trying to cover up SARS, the Chinese have been remarkably transparent in both mass media and scholarly journals.
The Saudis, however, are saying much less about their MERS cases except in research reports usually written in English. In official Saudi announcements we always get the bare minimum of information, and we have to play detective to figure out even if the latest reported death was a nosocomial infection.
This seems to me a strategic error in crisis communications, right up there with the Cubans' official silence on cholera. It makes us skeptical even of the little information we get, and very skeptical of the Saudis' (and Cubans') basic competence in dealing with such outbreaks. And it reminds me of an old saying my grandfather was fond of: "If you're so rich, why aren't you smart?"
Recent Comments