Via Eurosurveillance: Infectious disease screening in asylum seekers: range, coverage and economic evaluation in Germany, 2015. Excerpt from the discussion section:
This study analysed the compulsory medical screening of asylum seekers in Germany and provided estimates of the coverage and costs relative to expected yields. By listing and comparing state-level policies, we generated a comprehensive nation-wide overview of the content of screening programmes.
Our study reveals substantial heterogeneity with respect to the range of compulsory screening tests stipulated by state policies and illustrates how this affects the proportion of asylum seekers screened as a consequence of the quota-based allocation system. The heterogeneity in screening policies leads to different economic impacts with respect to the distribution of the costs of receiving asylum seekers; federal states with the same level of economic strength mobilise different amounts of resources per asylum seeker for medical screening implementation.
A high number and proportion of newly arrived asylum seekers were affected by compulsory screening for STIs (hepatitis B, syphilis or HIV) and stool examinations, in addition to the mandatory chest X-ray performed in asylum seekers ≥ 16 years of age. This resulted in total costs for Germany of more than 10 million EUR in 2015, a conservative, lower-bound estimate assuming full reimbursement according to statutory insurance fees.
The sensitivity analysis showed that the total costs at the upper-bound using private fees could be up to 30% higher, which further argues in favour of the introduction of electronic health cards for asylum seekers and their integration into the regular healthcare system in Germany.
We found high costs of medical screening relative to expected yields, raising questions on the cost-effectiveness of screening for some of the pathogens or diseases. By far the highest cost per identified case with respect to the initial screening test was found for Shigella spp. (> 80,000 EUR), followed by Salmonella spp. and TB (each > 5,000 EUR), syphilis (> 1,000 EUR), as well as HIV (> 700 EUR) and hepatitis B infections (> 600 EUR).
Considering the co-existing private fee arrangements for conducting the medical screenings, the benefits of screening relative to programme costs are likely to be even lower, especially for infections with HIV, hepatitis B and enteropathogens.
Recent Comments